Audi stirs up Dakar roadbook controversy - Motor Informed
Rally

Audi stirs up Dakar roadbook controversy



Within the Al Qaisumah bivouac, positioned 100 kilometers from the border with Kuwait, the echoes of the bitter controversy which stirred the primary stage of the Dakar nonetheless resonate strongly. On Sunday, many favorites misplaced a whole lot of time at kilometer 257.6 of the particular by committing navigation errors.

Essentially the most important voices, no less than publicly, come from the Audi Sport staff, which has expressed its dissatisfaction and disagreement with the roadbook in addition to with the reasons given by ASO in current hours. Though the staff has not filed a grievance but, they’re finding out this chance and have 24 hours to take action after the official publication of the outcomes, which passed off this Monday at 5:25 p.m. native time.

Nevertheless, from a authorized standpoint, the Sporting Rules of the FIA ​​World Rally-Raid Championship state in article 14.2.1 that “the roadbook is created and reviewed by professionals. No grievance will be registered towards the indications of the roadbook”.

“We now have had a whole lot of discussions over the previous 24 hours and we nonetheless imagine that the roadbook was not appropriate”, insists Sven Quand, director of Q Motorsport, accomplice construction of Audi Sport on the Dakar. “If a mean heading of 10 ° is indicated after which we now have to go in a 280 ° route, I believe the deviation is a bit large, let’s put it like that. Plenty of rivals acquired misplaced and that is it. which is admittedly shocking. Up to now, the organizer has not accepted something and says that every thing has been completed accurately, which is a disgrace, as a result of we must always not run like that. “

“Some groups discovered it, however they went straight to their left, and the way in which they discovered it’s shocking, actually. Clearly it is a mistake, everybody understands it. However the laws says you’ll be able to’t sue the roadbook. But when they make a mistake like that, it makes life very troublesome for us. The roadbook needs to be rather more exact. “

The controversy escalated as a result of Sven Quandt hinted at Spanish tv station TVE on Sunday that Nasser Al-Attiyah and Matthieu Baumel knew greater than the remainder. “It is humorous that just one automotive actually took the precise highway”, he mentioned. “In our opinion, they should have had info, as a result of in any other case we can not discover this highway.”

This Monday, the German staff supervisor clarified his level: “I did not say it like that. All I mentioned was that it’s apparent that solely two automobiles didn’t make a mistake and went on the precise highway, similar to a couple of bikes. . Perhaps they’re tremendous good and so they deserve it. “

The director of the Dakar, David Castera, wished to reply to the controversy in feedback relayed by AFP.

“I discover it a bit surprising to make such accusations with out proof”, he lamented. “The confidential a part of the course has been enormously strengthened. Matthieu [Baumel] can not have the cardboard. He can not research the course earlier than. Sven Quandt says he could have been given the lead [GPS]. However to comply with the path, you want a telephone and a GPS, which is now prohibited. “

“For 2 years we now have had a CCTV system for the automobiles. There’s a entrance view and a rear view of the crew. We see what they’re doing with their fingers all through the stage. [dimanche] night, my groups research them on the half the place the pilots made a mistake. There isn’t any irregularity. “

Additionally learn:

No Video(s) Found

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Toyota unveils its Rally1 for the 2022 season
Espargaro: “No panic” if new Honda MotoGP bike not immediately fast
For Ezpeleta, Petrucci’s profitable Dakar reveals the extent of MotoGP
Alonso: Oldest driver tag now provides me a bonus in F1
After the Dakar, Petrucci prepares his return to hurry – GP Inside

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *